Blog

RSI explained: how to read the Relative Strength Index (and where it fails)

The Relative Strength Index is the most widely-used momentum oscillator in technical analysis. What the 0-100 scale measures, where the 30/70 thresholds come from, and how QScoring uses RSI inside the momentum factor.

The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is a bounded oscillator that ranges from 0 to 100 and measures the magnitude of recent gains relative to recent losses. It was developed by J. Welles Wilder Jr. in 1978 and remains one of the most widely-used technical indicators five decades later.

The conventional reading is simple — above 70 is “overbought,” below 30 is “oversold” — but the simplicity hides where the indicator earns its keep and where it fails. Here's how to read it without falling into either of the two most common traps.

What the formula actually says

RSI = 100 − 100 ÷ (1 + RS), where RS = avg gain ÷ avg loss over N days

The default lookback is N = 14 trading days. “Avg gain” and “avg loss” are exponential moving averages of up-days and down-days respectively over that window. The bounded 0-100 scale comes from the formula structure — RS goes from 0 (all losses) to infinity (all gains), and the transformation maps it cleanly to 0-100.

QScoring uses RSI(14) — Wilder's original 14-day setting. Shorter windows (e.g., RSI(7)) are more sensitive to recent moves; longer windows (RSI(28)) are smoother but slower.

How to read it

The textbook reading:

That reading is right often enough to be useful but wrong often enough to be dangerous. Two important nuances:

How QScoring uses it

RSI(14) is one of five inputs in the QScoring momentum factor, alongside 12-month, 3-month, and 1-month trailing returns and the 50-day vs 200-day moving-average position.

Unlike the trailing-return metrics (which are sector-normalized), RSI uses a fixed non-monotonic scoring curve. Low RSI scores well (oversold rebound potential), mid-high RSI also scores well (healthy momentum), but extreme high RSI scores down (overbought risk). The full mapping is documented on the methodology page.

That non-monotonic curve is intentional. Treating RSI linearly (“higher is better”) would reward stocks at exactly the moment they're most stretched. The curve says “some momentum is good, too much is dangerous.”

Real example

Browse a few live tickers and look at the RSI metric inside the momentum factor card. Stocks that have rallied hard recently (e.g., the AI-cycle leaders like NVDA in strong-tape periods) often show RSI in the 65–75 range. Stocks in pullbacks show RSI in the 30s. The score for that metric will reflect the non-monotonic mapping — neither extreme scores the highest.

Common mistakes

Related reads

Discussion

Comments are powered by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with GitHub to join the conversation.

← All posts